Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, November 21, 2008

The best?

Shortly before I began drafting this entry, Brett Lee has just taken his 300th Test wicket for Australia. That makes him something like the 24th international player to achieve that significant milestone. This is a wonderful achievement but at the same time it made me think about just how much things have changed.

English fast bowler, 'Fiery' Fred Trueman was the first to achieve 300 wickets back in the 1964. He later retired after taking a total of 307 wickets, famously stating that anyone who passed that figure would be 'bloody tired'.

West Indian off-spinner, Lance Gibbs, slipped by Trueman against Australia in 1975-76, finishing with 309. Ironically this was the only time I can ever recall a crowd at the Melbourne Cricket Ground actually chanting for an opposition bowler to be given a bowl.

My boyhood idol, Dennis Lillee, passed the 300 mark in 1981, taking over from Gibbs as the record holder later that summer, ultimately retiring with 355 wickets.

Just over a century elapsed between the start of Test cricket and Dennis Lillee becoming the third player to achieve that record. Twenty-seven years later, more than twenty more players have achieved the milestone. The world record has progressed from 355 all the way to 756 (Muralitharan).

In light of this progression, I wondered just how well these bowlers from different eras shape up against each other. I decided to do a little statistical analysis. Starting with the current top ten wicket takers, I added Dennis Lillee, Fred Trueman, Lance Gibbs and Brett Lee to the mix. Then just to really throw a spanner into the works, I added in pre-World War Two Australian leg-spinner, Clarrie Grimmett.


Player

Span

Mat

Wkts

Ave

wickets per test ratio

1

M Muralitharan (ICC/SL)

1992-2008

123

756

21.96

6.15

2

SK Warne (Aus)

1992-2007

145

708

25.41

4.88

3

A Kumble (India)

1990-2008

132

619

29.65

4.69

4

GD McGrath (Aus)

1993-2007

124

563

21.64

4.54

5

CA Walsh (WI)

1984-2001

132

519

24.44

3.93

6

N Kapil Dev (India)

1978-1994

131

434

29.64

3.31

7

Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ)

1973-1990

86

431

22.29

5.01

8

SM Pollock (SA)

1995-2008

108

421

23.11

3.90

9

Wasim Akram (Pak)

1985-2002

104

414

23.62

3.98

10

CEL Ambrose (WI)

1988-2000

98

405

20.99

4.13


DK Lillee (Aus)

1971-1984

70

355

23.92

5.07


LR Gibbs (WI)

1958-1976

79

309

29.09

3.91


FS Trueman (Eng)

1952-1965

67

307

21.57

4.58


B Lee (Aus)

1999-2008

73

300

30.35

4.11


CV Grimmett

1925-1936

37

216

24.21

5.84


That list seems pretty straight forward. A heck of a lot more cricket is played today, as reflected in the total match figures. Compare say Lillee's 70 Tests to Kapil Dev's 131! So how do we compare things by taking this variation in total tests played into consideration? Here is a comparison by bowling average. Three of the current top ten wickets takers have dropped down out of the top ten positions in my list: Warne (708), Dev (434) and Kumble (619).


Player

Span

Mat

Wkts

Ave

wickets per test ratio

1

CEL Ambrose (WI)

1988-2000

98

405

20.99

4.13

2

FS Trueman (Eng)

1952-1965

67

307

21.57

4.58

3

GD McGrath (Aus)

1993-2007

124

563

21.64

4.54

4

M Muralitharan (ICC/SL)

1992-2008

123

756

21.96

6.15

5

Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ)

1973-1990

86

431

22.29

5.01

6

SM Pollock (SA)

1995-2008

108

421

23.11

3.90

7

Wasim Akram (Pak)

1985-2002

104

414

23.62

3.98

8

DK Lillee (Aus)

1971-1984

70

355

23.92

5.07

9

CV Grimmett

1925-1936

37

216

24.21

5.84

10

CA Walsh (WI)

1984-2001

132

519

24.44

3.93


SK Warne (Aus)

1992-2007

145

708

25.41

4.88


LR Gibbs (WI)

1958-1976

79

309

29.09

3.91


N Kapil Dev (India)

1978-1994

131

434

29.64

3.31


A Kumble (India)

1990-2008

132

619

29.65

4.69


B Lee (Aus)

1999-2008

73

300

30.35

4.11


Statistics may be massaged to show just about anything. At the end of the day however, I think that the real test of a bowler is their ability to keep consistently taking wickets. Certainly that is what a captain is looking for. I have sorted the list by a ratio of average number of wickets per test match played.


Player

Span

Mat

Wkts

Ave

wickets per test ratio








1

M Muralitharan (ICC/SL)

1992-2008

123

756

21.96

6.15

2

CV Grimmett

1925-1936

37

216

24.21

5.84

3

DK Lillee (Aus)

1971-1984

70

355

23.92

5.07

4

Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ)

1973-1990

86

431

22.29

5.01

5

SK Warne (Aus)

1992-2007

145

708

25.41

4.88

6

A Kumble (India)

1990-2008

132

619

29.65

4.69

7

FS Trueman (Eng)

1952-1965

67

307

21.57

4.58

8

GD McGrath (Aus)

1993-2007

124

563

21.64

4.54

9

CEL Ambrose (WI)

1988-2000

98

405

20.99

4.13

10

B Lee (Aus)

1999-2008

73

300

30.35

4.11


Wasim Akram (Pak)

1985-2002

104

414

23.62

3.98


CA Walsh (WI)

1984-2001

132

519

24.44

3.93


LR Gibbs (WI)

1958-1976

79

309

29.09

3.91


SM Pollock (SA)

1995-2008

108

421

23.11

3.90


N Kapil Dev (India)

1978-1994

131

434

29.64

3.31


Muralitharan has returned to the top of the list with a startling average of more than six wickets per Test. However Clarrie Grimmett has rocketed to second position with just short of six wickets per Test. Dennis Lillee comes in next, marginally ahead of Australia's nemesis during the 1980s, New Zealand's Sir Richard Hadlee. Akram, Walsh and Pollock all now drop out of the top ten.

So what does this all really mean? Does it show who was best? Does Clarrie Grimmett deserve to be holding the tag of best ever leg-spinner ahead of Shane Warne? Was Dennis Lillee the best fast bowler ever? I cannot really answer any of these questions.
There are too many variables that cannot be fully taken into account. For example, Murilatharan plays a lot more cricket on turning wickets. Grounds, conditions and pitch preparation today are different to those of Grimmett's era. Even the rules changed here and there.

All I can really say is that
I have seen all play except Grimmett and I am in absolute awe of all of the bowlers mentioned in this entry. Without doubt, each has truly been an exceptional exponent of the bowling art.

All statistics and images from www.cricinfo.com

No comments: