Shortly before I began drafting this entry, Brett Lee has just taken his 300th Test wicket for Australia. That makes him something like the 24th international player to achieve that significant milestone. This is a wonderful achievement but at the same time it made me think about just how much things have changed.
English fast bowler, 'Fiery' Fred Trueman was the first to achieve 300 wickets back in the 1964. He later retired after taking a total of 307 wickets, famously stating that anyone who passed that figure would be 'bloody tired'.
West Indian off-spinner, Lance Gibbs, slipped by Trueman against Australia in 1975-76, finishing with 309. Ironically this was the only time I can ever recall a crowd at the Melbourne Cricket Ground actually chanting for an opposition bowler to be given a bowl.
My boyhood idol, Dennis Lillee, passed the 300 mark in 1981, taking over from Gibbs as the record holder later that summer, ultimately retiring with 355 wickets.
Just over a century elapsed between the start of Test cricket and Dennis Lillee becoming the third player to achieve that record. Twenty-seven years later, more than twenty more players have achieved the milestone. The world record has progressed from 355 all the way to 756 (Muralitharan).
In light of this progression, I wondered just how well these bowlers from different eras shape up against each other. I decided to do a little statistical analysis. Starting with the current top ten wicket takers, I added Dennis Lillee, Fred Trueman, Lance Gibbs and Brett Lee to the mix. Then just to really throw a spanner into the works, I added in pre-World War Two Australian leg-spinner, Clarrie Grimmett.
Player | Span | Mat | Wkts | Ave | wickets per test ratio | |
1 | M Muralitharan (ICC/SL) | 1992-2008 | 123 | 756 | 21.96 | 6.15 |
2 | SK Warne (Aus) | 1992-2007 | 145 | 708 | 25.41 | 4.88 |
3 | A Kumble (India) | 1990-2008 | 132 | 619 | 29.65 | 4.69 |
4 | GD McGrath (Aus) | 1993-2007 | 124 | 563 | 21.64 | 4.54 |
5 | CA Walsh (WI) | 1984-2001 | 132 | 519 | 24.44 | 3.93 |
6 | N Kapil Dev (India) | 1978-1994 | 131 | 434 | 29.64 | 3.31 |
7 | Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) | 1973-1990 | 86 | 431 | 22.29 | 5.01 |
8 | SM Pollock (SA) | 1995-2008 | 108 | 421 | 23.11 | 3.90 |
9 | Wasim Akram (Pak) | 1985-2002 | 104 | 414 | 23.62 | 3.98 |
10 | CEL Ambrose (WI) | 1988-2000 | 98 | 405 | 20.99 | 4.13 |
DK Lillee (Aus) | 1971-1984 | 70 | 355 | 23.92 | 5.07 | |
LR Gibbs (WI) | 1958-1976 | 79 | 309 | 29.09 | 3.91 | |
FS Trueman (Eng) | 1952-1965 | 67 | 307 | 21.57 | 4.58 | |
B Lee (Aus) | 1999-2008 | 73 | 300 | 30.35 | 4.11 | |
CV Grimmett | 1925-1936 | 37 | 216 | 24.21 | 5.84 |
That list seems pretty straight forward. A heck of a lot more cricket is played today, as reflected in the total match figures. Compare say Lillee's 70 Tests to Kapil Dev's 131! So how do we compare things by taking this variation in total tests played into consideration? Here is a comparison by bowling average. Three of the current top ten wickets takers have dropped down out of the top ten positions in my list: Warne (708), Dev (434) and Kumble (619).
Player | Span | Mat | Wkts | Ave | wickets per test ratio | |
1 | CEL Ambrose (WI) | 1988-2000 | 98 | 405 | 20.99 | 4.13 |
2 | FS Trueman (Eng) | 1952-1965 | 67 | 307 | 21.57 | 4.58 |
3 | GD McGrath (Aus) | 1993-2007 | 124 | 563 | 21.64 | 4.54 |
4 | M Muralitharan (ICC/SL) | 1992-2008 | 123 | 756 | 21.96 | 6.15 |
5 | Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) | 1973-1990 | 86 | 431 | 22.29 | 5.01 |
6 | SM Pollock (SA) | 1995-2008 | 108 | 421 | 23.11 | 3.90 |
7 | Wasim Akram (Pak) | 1985-2002 | 104 | 414 | 23.62 | 3.98 |
8 | DK Lillee (Aus) | 1971-1984 | 70 | 355 | 23.92 | 5.07 |
9 | CV Grimmett | 1925-1936 | 37 | 216 | 24.21 | 5.84 |
10 | CA Walsh (WI) | 1984-2001 | 132 | 519 | 24.44 | 3.93 |
SK Warne (Aus) | 1992-2007 | 145 | 708 | 25.41 | 4.88 | |
LR Gibbs (WI) | 1958-1976 | 79 | 309 | 29.09 | 3.91 | |
N Kapil Dev (India) | 1978-1994 | 131 | 434 | 29.64 | 3.31 | |
A Kumble (India) | 1990-2008 | 132 | 619 | 29.65 | 4.69 | |
B Lee (Aus) | 1999-2008 | 73 | 300 | 30.35 | 4.11 |
Statistics may be massaged to show just about anything. At the end of the day however, I think that the real test of a bowler is their ability to keep consistently taking wickets. Certainly that is what a captain is looking for. I have sorted the list by a ratio of average number of wickets per test match played.
Player | Span | Mat | Wkts | Ave | wickets per test ratio | |
1 | M Muralitharan (ICC/SL) | 1992-2008 | 123 | 756 | 21.96 | 6.15 |
2 | CV Grimmett | 1925-1936 | 37 | 216 | 24.21 | 5.84 |
3 | DK Lillee (Aus) | 1971-1984 | 70 | 355 | 23.92 | 5.07 |
4 | Sir RJ Hadlee (NZ) | 1973-1990 | 86 | 431 | 22.29 | 5.01 |
5 | SK Warne (Aus) | 1992-2007 | 145 | 708 | 25.41 | 4.88 |
6 | A Kumble (India) | 1990-2008 | 132 | 619 | 29.65 | 4.69 |
7 | FS Trueman (Eng) | 1952-1965 | 67 | 307 | 21.57 | 4.58 |
8 | GD McGrath (Aus) | 1993-2007 | 124 | 563 | 21.64 | 4.54 |
9 | CEL Ambrose (WI) | 1988-2000 | 98 | 405 | 20.99 | 4.13 |
10 | B Lee (Aus) | 1999-2008 | 73 | 300 | 30.35 | 4.11 |
Wasim Akram (Pak) | 1985-2002 | 104 | 414 | 23.62 | 3.98 | |
CA Walsh (WI) | 1984-2001 | 132 | 519 | 24.44 | 3.93 | |
LR Gibbs (WI) | 1958-1976 | 79 | 309 | 29.09 | 3.91 | |
SM Pollock (SA) | 1995-2008 | 108 | 421 | 23.11 | 3.90 | |
N Kapil Dev (India) | 1978-1994 | 131 | 434 | 29.64 | 3.31 |
Muralitharan has returned to the top of the list with a startling average of more than six wickets per Test. However Clarrie Grimmett has rocketed to second position with just short of six wickets per Test. Dennis Lillee comes in next, marginally ahead of Australia's nemesis during the 1980s, New Zealand's Sir Richard Hadlee. Akram, Walsh and Pollock all now drop out of the top ten.
So what does this all really mean? Does it show who was best? Does Clarrie Grimmett deserve to be holding the tag of best ever leg-spinner ahead of Shane Warne? Was Dennis Lillee the best fast bowler ever? I cannot really answer any of these questions. There are too many variables that cannot be fully taken into account. For example, Murilatharan plays a lot more cricket on turning wickets. Grounds, conditions and pitch preparation today are different to those of Grimmett's era. Even the rules changed here and there.
All I can really say is that I have seen all play except Grimmett and I am in absolute awe of all of the bowlers mentioned in this entry. Without doubt, each has truly been an exceptional exponent of the bowling art.
All statistics and images from www.cricinfo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment